You: Jeez, Ellie and Kelly, it's been a really long time since you blogged. What's the dealio?
Me: Two things.
1. IRB (Institutional Review Board)
IRB is a very interesting entity to deal with. We've been struggling since the trial round of TEP to get everything approved and to get all of the signatures we need, etc. Because inmates are considered a sensitive population, IRB is super careful about approving protocol for studies in correctional settings. I totally respect that and I get it, but at the same time we're several months behind and it's been an incredibly frustrating process.
2. Bees
Ellie and I have been crazy busy with finishing up our first full year as graduate students. In case you hadn't heard, grad school is real difficult, especially when that grad school is WashU. I know what you're thinking: "Kelly, if you've had time to watch seven seasons of One Tree Hill, certainly you've had time to write a blog post." Yeah, you're probably right, imaginary heckler. Cue the boos and the tomatoes.
Since the trial run, Ellie has finished up her hours here at the DOC. I'll be done in a few weeks. Ellie started her next practicum at the Public Defender's office, which is an amazing opportunity that will let her see an entirely different side to the justice system. I've been doing programming here at CJC with certified juveniles (AKA juveniles 15+ that have been charged as adults because of the nature of their crimes). I've also been helping out Carrie with the Concordance Academy and Institute, which has been SO COOL. I can't believe that I have the opportunity to be a part of this groundbreaking initiative that will soon be up and running as one of the premier holistic reentry programs in the country. We're on the frontier of social justice, people!!
Anyway. We finally were able to start the study portion of TEP on June 9, which means that we had our first official graduating class TODAY! I've been facilitating by myself so that Ellie can use her research hours to do interviews. It's been weird not having my partner in crime (ha!) around because we balance each other out so well, but I'm starting to get used to it.
Because the interview process takes so long (1 hour+ for each interview!), the class has been really small so far. We started out with two and ended up with four, but now we'll be back down to two because the first guys graduated.
Having a small group has been kind of nice. It's much more personal and easy to get everyone's input. I've been setting up the room with two tables in an L shape and sitting in a chair in front of the tables so that we can have a sort of pseudo-circle and still have surfaces to write on. I think this has really helped everyone feel comfortable sharing and speaking up.
Another thing that I feel is really helpful is genuineness on the part of the facilitator. Ellie and I both approach teaching in a very collaborative manner, and we've learned to be flexible during class and discussion. These guys are the same age as we are, and as such we understand that there are going to be times when you joke around or cuss or go on a little tangent or talk about other important things or whatever. It's okay to get a little weird with it. It's much less stressful for the facilitator to know that you don't have to be on this power pedestal all the time, and I would imagine it's less stressful for the participants because they know we will be understanding and that they won't be judged.
I'm realizing that it's never going to get easier to say goodbye to our participants. I have such affection for the two guys that graduated today. They're so sweet, kind, and funny, and I have no doubt that they will be able to succeed if they can stay focused and goal-oriented. How lucky we've been to have such wonderful class members thus far! I tell you what, if you ever are feeling bad about yourself, go teach a class in a correctional facility with emerging adults. This age group is so open, genuine, and not afraid to tell you what they think (bad or good!). I can't tell you how many times I left class feeling such a self-esteem boost. It's great to feel like you're helping people, and it's even better when you feel like the people you are helping are as fond of you as you are of them.
After our little graduation ceremony (basically just giving certificates and saying words of encouragement), I gave the guys a feedback survey. I'm taking a program evaluation class right now and have decided to evaluate the process of administering TEP and to what extent it is administered with fidelity to the manual. I'm going to synthesize all of the data from those surveys and my own personal fidelity checklist and will update the blog with the info soon!
Until next time,
E&K
Thursday, July 2, 2015
Friday, April 24, 2015
A Pause for Reflection
Over the course of the semester Kelly and I have learned a lot about bureaucracy and red-tape within the government and system of higher education. I highly underestimated the difficultly associated with getting a study approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) particularly when it comes to at risk populations, like inmates. Today that red-tape reared its ugly head again as it is postponing the start of the study for another week or two.
Having the week off from teaching allowed me to take some time to reflect about the barriers social workers face in changing the landscape of the criminal justice system. As a student at the Brown School, for the majority of my day I operate in super supportive circles that understand the importance of addressing things like the overpopulation and disparities within our criminal justice system. I interact with people see the overlapping issues between untreated health concerns, low paying jobs, lack of paid leave, the educational system, and the list goes on. Sometimes I forget that not everybody lives and breathes social problems and possible remedies. However; the more time I spend outside of the Brown School, the more I run into people that simply do not understand.
If the criminal justice system is not directly affecting you, why would you care? As a person working with an inmate population, you would think that I would have a bullet proof answer as to why interventions like TEP and mentors post-release are necessary, but the fact is that I don't--besides the fact it is colossal waste of money. While some may find the argument of money to suffice, I don't see convincing people that the criminal justice system is a waste of money as success. I want something that tugs peoples heart-strings, that prompts action, I want to to humanize people in the criminal justice system and prove that they are worthy, preferably in 90 seconds or less. The problem is, how do you consolidate the history of a slave-based economy, segregation, medical abuse and experimentation, and the implications of poverty when the barriers today are seemingly gone? It is exhausting and overwhelming and some people simply do not want to see.
While I still am working on my elevator speech as to why every American should care about decreasing the size of the criminal justice system and addressing the overwhelming racial disparities, I am getting closer. This week I watched an excellent presentation given by some fellow classmates and they referred to this quote:
"You do not take a man who for years has been hobbled by chains, liberate him, bring him to the starting line of a race, saying, "you are free to compete with all the others." and still justly believe you have been complete fair..." Lyndon B Johnson
While President Johnson wasn't referring to the criminal justice system during this particular speech, I think it can be applied to the importance of investing in programming for inmates pre and post release. After reading this quote it seems a bit silly that we expect anything other than failure from the current model.
Until next time,
E & K
"You do not take a man who for years has been hobbled by chains, liberate him, bring him to the starting line of a race, saying, "you are free to compete with all the others." and still justly believe you have been complete fair..." Lyndon B Johnson
While President Johnson wasn't referring to the criminal justice system during this particular speech, I think it can be applied to the importance of investing in programming for inmates pre and post release. After reading this quote it seems a bit silly that we expect anything other than failure from the current model.
Until next time,
E & K
Thursday, April 16, 2015
Jump into opportunity
Our first TEP group officially ended last Friday, and we've gotten lots of great feedback. Word is spreading throughout the jail, and one of the guards told us that guys have been asking if they can be in our group. It's incredibly fulfilling to know that our students appreciate what we did and to know that they feel motivated and more prepared to enter the job market when they are released.
One of our group members shared some keen insight when we were broken up into small groups on our last day. We were talking about overcoming stereotypes during job interviews, and he said, "Jump into opportunity as quickly as you jump to conclusions." I was speechless for a moment before I realized that I should probably grab a pen and write it down.
I think that's the best possible advice that we could give not only our group, but also anyone reading our blog and to our friends and colleagues. It's such a wise quote. In fact, I hereby dub it Quote of Wisdom. Yesterday I was thinking about how the QOW applies to recent arguments surrounding minimum wage.
It seems like people in general draw certain conclusions—based in stereotypes—about certain minimum wage positions. Jobs like a fast food employee, factory worker, and cashier have certain connotations. I'll throw out some that I've heard: "unskilled," "low life," "low class," "high school," "dirty." Some believe that minimum wage positions should remain that way because the workers fit into the categories and descriptors I just listed. The real danger here is that when people make these judgments, they are not just speaking in confidence to friends about it; they're protesting and posting on the Internet. And if those "low life" workers hear those negative stereotypes enough, they will start to believe them.
Additionally, people applying for minimum wage positions might jump to conclusions themselves, and instead of jumping into the opportunity a job could offer them, they might feel averse to it because of what other people will think. And in the case of our students, unemployment means higher risk for recidivism. Even if our students do get a minimum wage job, the current minimum wage is not enough for them to find safe housing and support their families, which again leads to recidivism.
I think it's pretty clear what my own opinions are regarding the current minimum wage, but the basic point I'm trying to make is that we shouldn't pass judgment on someone because of his or her job title. We should not assume that someone does not deserve to get paid more because of his or her place of employment. I've seen a lot of protestors asking for $15 per hour, which is a ton of money and likely unrealistic, but I do think that minimum wage workers deserve more.
It's easy to think that this doesn't affect you, but let's take an example from our population again (I'm sticking with inmates here because it's what I know best and because I've been working closely with inmates and employment). Let's say one of our students is released. Because of our program (yay!), he has the skills he needs to apply for and obtain a job as a cashier at McDonald's. He is excited to work so that he can take care of his wife/girlfriend and young child. But he soon discovers that, even if he works overtime, the money is simply not enough to buy all of the essentials, pay the bills, rent an adequate apartment in a decent area, and sent his child to school. He can take advantage of upward mobility within the restaurant, but he will not be able to get promoted soon enough to solve these problems as quickly as they need to be solved. He begins to feel hopeless and in despair, returns to drugs, and begins stealing for himself and his family. He gets caught, arrested, and sent to jail again. Who pays for his jail stay?
YOU do. Your tax dollars do.
If we all stopped thinking of ourselves as "better than" and sought to collaborate instead to bolster our country's minimum wage workers as much as possible, we (and our wallets) would live much more happily.
I want to return to the stereotypes I had heard describing those individuals in minimum wage positions. None of those descriptions were particularly flattering or positive, so I'd like to offer some alternatives: "trying," "learning," "gaining skills," "beginning," "hard working," "mobility," "motivated."
We know we are sending our students out into a society that is generally unreceptive to them and into a market that is hesitant to hire them. We hope that through sharing our experiences with them and our views that we can inspire you to jump into the opportunity to help them. It could be something as simple as ceasing condescending speech based in judgment, or it could be as involved as petitioning to increase the pay of your employees or colleagues.
Whatever you choose to do, it is helpful to remain cognizant of the fact that these issues affect everyone. Ellie and I work very closely with the issue of employment and minimum wage, so we can see the connections very clearly, and hopefully we've helped you to see the connections and the widespread impact of this issue.
Until next time,
E & K
One of our group members shared some keen insight when we were broken up into small groups on our last day. We were talking about overcoming stereotypes during job interviews, and he said, "Jump into opportunity as quickly as you jump to conclusions." I was speechless for a moment before I realized that I should probably grab a pen and write it down.
I think that's the best possible advice that we could give not only our group, but also anyone reading our blog and to our friends and colleagues. It's such a wise quote. In fact, I hereby dub it Quote of Wisdom. Yesterday I was thinking about how the QOW applies to recent arguments surrounding minimum wage.
It seems like people in general draw certain conclusions—based in stereotypes—about certain minimum wage positions. Jobs like a fast food employee, factory worker, and cashier have certain connotations. I'll throw out some that I've heard: "unskilled," "low life," "low class," "high school," "dirty." Some believe that minimum wage positions should remain that way because the workers fit into the categories and descriptors I just listed. The real danger here is that when people make these judgments, they are not just speaking in confidence to friends about it; they're protesting and posting on the Internet. And if those "low life" workers hear those negative stereotypes enough, they will start to believe them.
Additionally, people applying for minimum wage positions might jump to conclusions themselves, and instead of jumping into the opportunity a job could offer them, they might feel averse to it because of what other people will think. And in the case of our students, unemployment means higher risk for recidivism. Even if our students do get a minimum wage job, the current minimum wage is not enough for them to find safe housing and support their families, which again leads to recidivism.
I think it's pretty clear what my own opinions are regarding the current minimum wage, but the basic point I'm trying to make is that we shouldn't pass judgment on someone because of his or her job title. We should not assume that someone does not deserve to get paid more because of his or her place of employment. I've seen a lot of protestors asking for $15 per hour, which is a ton of money and likely unrealistic, but I do think that minimum wage workers deserve more.
It's easy to think that this doesn't affect you, but let's take an example from our population again (I'm sticking with inmates here because it's what I know best and because I've been working closely with inmates and employment). Let's say one of our students is released. Because of our program (yay!), he has the skills he needs to apply for and obtain a job as a cashier at McDonald's. He is excited to work so that he can take care of his wife/girlfriend and young child. But he soon discovers that, even if he works overtime, the money is simply not enough to buy all of the essentials, pay the bills, rent an adequate apartment in a decent area, and sent his child to school. He can take advantage of upward mobility within the restaurant, but he will not be able to get promoted soon enough to solve these problems as quickly as they need to be solved. He begins to feel hopeless and in despair, returns to drugs, and begins stealing for himself and his family. He gets caught, arrested, and sent to jail again. Who pays for his jail stay?
YOU do. Your tax dollars do.
If we all stopped thinking of ourselves as "better than" and sought to collaborate instead to bolster our country's minimum wage workers as much as possible, we (and our wallets) would live much more happily.
I want to return to the stereotypes I had heard describing those individuals in minimum wage positions. None of those descriptions were particularly flattering or positive, so I'd like to offer some alternatives: "trying," "learning," "gaining skills," "beginning," "hard working," "mobility," "motivated."
We know we are sending our students out into a society that is generally unreceptive to them and into a market that is hesitant to hire them. We hope that through sharing our experiences with them and our views that we can inspire you to jump into the opportunity to help them. It could be something as simple as ceasing condescending speech based in judgment, or it could be as involved as petitioning to increase the pay of your employees or colleagues.
Whatever you choose to do, it is helpful to remain cognizant of the fact that these issues affect everyone. Ellie and I work very closely with the issue of employment and minimum wage, so we can see the connections very clearly, and hopefully we've helped you to see the connections and the widespread impact of this issue.
Until next time,
E & K
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
The Final Stretch
Time is flying and I cannot believe that I have logged over 200 hours at the City Justice Center and Medium Security Institution getting the TEP program off the ground. It is safe to say that I never expected to spend this much time within a correctional institution, but this is really just the beginning of the study.
This group we have had for our trial has been beyond incredible. I have learned so much from each of them and it is going to be really hard to see them go next week knowing that my professional boundaries will prohibit me from maintaining contact with any of them. I never say myself working with clients due to me being a macro thinker, and because of that my attention to techniques we learned in our Practice 1 course, like closing a group session, pretty much went in one ear and out the other (shh). Little did I know that at the end of week three I would be trying to find a way to maintain contact with out students, because it seems like we are cutting the cord WAY too soon. I think closing the session is going to be the hardest thing we have done yet. I want to know if they are going to job fairs, using the resource book, writing thank-you letters like we taught them, and eating citrus fruits that they missed so much. Unfortunately this is not my role, but there will be another person there to help them on the other side. Or at least this is how I have to think in order not to get too upset.
In today's class Kelly and I focused on interviewing. The guys laughed about wearing pinky rings and tennis-shoes into interviews as obvious no-nos. After going over basic interview attire, we chose to do an activity that we di as students during orientation to the Brown School. It was a stereotype activity. Around the room we had six posters which were titled, "Black man driving a Benz," "Latino man," "Asian man," "Black man with dreads," "Blonde woman wearing a skirt," and "Father holding a child's hand." We gave the participants a marker and asked them to go around to each poster and write stereotypes or things they believe about these people on the poster. If there were any characteristics that were written by another participant that they had also heard or agreed with, we asked them to put a dot next to that comment. It was a welcome addition to have movement, hear laughter, and conversation in the room while Kelly and I sat back and watched. By the end of the activity, the posters were full of comments. It was clear this activity got them thinking, especially when a participant identified with the stereotype on the poster (which we did intentionally). One particular participant with dreads saw stereotypes about himself being "locked up" and a "thug" and seemed super dejected about seeing the stereotypes in writing, which was hard to watch. It was painful to see young black men writing disproportionately negative stereotypes about themselves and know how much they will be up against when apply for jobs. In the end we came back as a group and asked them why we weer talking about stereotypes and interviewing in the same session. They were not fools and knew how much weight these stereotypes have and we as facilitators know how this plays out (in the City of Saint Louis the unemployment rate for Whites is 8.3% and for African Americans 23.3%). We wanted to be realistic with participants, but also empower them to break these ideas for themselves and others. We encourage you to think about how stereotypes impact your life and how you can be a part of reducing the weight of negative ones.
Until next time,
E & K
This group we have had for our trial has been beyond incredible. I have learned so much from each of them and it is going to be really hard to see them go next week knowing that my professional boundaries will prohibit me from maintaining contact with any of them. I never say myself working with clients due to me being a macro thinker, and because of that my attention to techniques we learned in our Practice 1 course, like closing a group session, pretty much went in one ear and out the other (shh). Little did I know that at the end of week three I would be trying to find a way to maintain contact with out students, because it seems like we are cutting the cord WAY too soon. I think closing the session is going to be the hardest thing we have done yet. I want to know if they are going to job fairs, using the resource book, writing thank-you letters like we taught them, and eating citrus fruits that they missed so much. Unfortunately this is not my role, but there will be another person there to help them on the other side. Or at least this is how I have to think in order not to get too upset.
In today's class Kelly and I focused on interviewing. The guys laughed about wearing pinky rings and tennis-shoes into interviews as obvious no-nos. After going over basic interview attire, we chose to do an activity that we di as students during orientation to the Brown School. It was a stereotype activity. Around the room we had six posters which were titled, "Black man driving a Benz," "Latino man," "Asian man," "Black man with dreads," "Blonde woman wearing a skirt," and "Father holding a child's hand." We gave the participants a marker and asked them to go around to each poster and write stereotypes or things they believe about these people on the poster. If there were any characteristics that were written by another participant that they had also heard or agreed with, we asked them to put a dot next to that comment. It was a welcome addition to have movement, hear laughter, and conversation in the room while Kelly and I sat back and watched. By the end of the activity, the posters were full of comments. It was clear this activity got them thinking, especially when a participant identified with the stereotype on the poster (which we did intentionally). One particular participant with dreads saw stereotypes about himself being "locked up" and a "thug" and seemed super dejected about seeing the stereotypes in writing, which was hard to watch. It was painful to see young black men writing disproportionately negative stereotypes about themselves and know how much they will be up against when apply for jobs. In the end we came back as a group and asked them why we weer talking about stereotypes and interviewing in the same session. They were not fools and knew how much weight these stereotypes have and we as facilitators know how this plays out (in the City of Saint Louis the unemployment rate for Whites is 8.3% and for African Americans 23.3%). We wanted to be realistic with participants, but also empower them to break these ideas for themselves and others. We encourage you to think about how stereotypes impact your life and how you can be a part of reducing the weight of negative ones.
Until next time,
E & K
Friday, April 3, 2015
Every New Beginning Comes from Some Other Beginning's End
We started on time (ish...baby steps) again today, AND we got to be in the classroom because GED class was canceled. Woohoo!
Today we started out class with a check in. We asked the group members to share one thing they learned from last class, and we also asked them to share any other programming that they attended at the jail as well as what additional programming they want/need.
Sadly, none of the guys participates in any other programming (which is mostly religious, by the way. Eighty percent of programming at the jails is faith-based). Their interest in programming, however, was high. Most of the guys said they wanted more physical activities, and some mentioned wanting art classes or a nutritional program.
Their frustration with the lack of options was evident. Ellie and I want to work to consolidate a lot of the religious programming to make room for more in-demand and evidence-based programs. Our group also seemed as frustrated as we are with the chain of command necessary to get anything done, and the miscommunication and wasted time that comes along with it.
This week we continued to break up into two smaller groups headed by each of us. This seems to be the most successful thing we've done. There are a couple of guys in class who are somewhat shy and hesitant to speak up, but when we work with them in a smaller group, they light up and are eager to share in a more intimate environment. Especially in a jail or prison setting, we definitely recommend this approach, as we have seen the best results from it. The guys talk more, retain more information, and are more actively involved in their own learning processes.
As we were working in small groups, I began to realize just how much I'm going to miss these guys. We work hard, but we also have moments where we just need to blow off some steam and joke around, or just spend a minute talking about something other than TEP. Today we talked about some of the guys' tattoos and what they meant to them, and we also told some funny stories from previous jobs. I noticed that after we took those little breaks (even if it was just 30 seconds to crack a joke or say something witty), they were so much more focused on the material when we got back to it.
Those little moments mean so much to me, because it gives me a glimpse into their lives. Almost all of the guys in our class are fathers, and it makes me so happy to hear about how they care for their children and enjoy the responsibility; family seems to be a huge motivating factor for them. I also love hearing all of their insights, because it reminds me to stay humble—I'm not above my students. They are such smart, articulate, funny, nice guys who made a mistake (or, sometimes, several mistakes) that landed them in corrections. We hope that we can bolster their motivation and help them see that they have all of these wonderful characteristics that can help them succeed in life if they keep working hard.
Another thing we've realized is how much the guys like being introspective and learning about themselves. Like I said, they're already intelligent. They know about job applications and resumes and cover letters and all that boring stuff (it's disappointing sometimes to realize just how remedial employment programming is). What they seem to really benefit from are things like a learning style (VARK) test or a discussion about their weaknesses and least favorite jobs. From this, they can learn what work environment and supervision style is best for them and how they can succeed and overcome barriers. We are going to incorporate several more "quiz" and discussion-provoking activities in the rest of the trial as well as during the study groups once they begin.
To send our guys off on a fun note, we are going to give each group member an envelope on the last day of class and have everyone write notes to each other. I was inspired by the senior send off in my high school choir. Every year, we would make bags for the seniors and decorate them and leave them notes about how they inspired us, or write down a favorite memory, or wish them luck. I thought it might be nice to do something similar for our group. It totally sucks that we can't follow up with them at all after the program or once they're released, so having something to remember us, each other, and their time in the group by could be a nice keepsake and a pick-me-up later on.
This activity will be a part of our closing. In any helping profession, when you are getting near the end of your time with a client, you want to take some time to talk to them about how you're both feeling about letting go. It's also vital to leave the client with confidence. I truly have all the confidence in the world in our guys, and we are going to take the time to tell them that and write them notes as well. I so wish that we could follow our little cubs out into the world, but unfortunately we have to let them go. And, more than all of our frustrations and set backs, that will be the hardest thing to do.
Until next time,
E & K
Today we started out class with a check in. We asked the group members to share one thing they learned from last class, and we also asked them to share any other programming that they attended at the jail as well as what additional programming they want/need.
Sadly, none of the guys participates in any other programming (which is mostly religious, by the way. Eighty percent of programming at the jails is faith-based). Their interest in programming, however, was high. Most of the guys said they wanted more physical activities, and some mentioned wanting art classes or a nutritional program.
Their frustration with the lack of options was evident. Ellie and I want to work to consolidate a lot of the religious programming to make room for more in-demand and evidence-based programs. Our group also seemed as frustrated as we are with the chain of command necessary to get anything done, and the miscommunication and wasted time that comes along with it.
This week we continued to break up into two smaller groups headed by each of us. This seems to be the most successful thing we've done. There are a couple of guys in class who are somewhat shy and hesitant to speak up, but when we work with them in a smaller group, they light up and are eager to share in a more intimate environment. Especially in a jail or prison setting, we definitely recommend this approach, as we have seen the best results from it. The guys talk more, retain more information, and are more actively involved in their own learning processes.
As we were working in small groups, I began to realize just how much I'm going to miss these guys. We work hard, but we also have moments where we just need to blow off some steam and joke around, or just spend a minute talking about something other than TEP. Today we talked about some of the guys' tattoos and what they meant to them, and we also told some funny stories from previous jobs. I noticed that after we took those little breaks (even if it was just 30 seconds to crack a joke or say something witty), they were so much more focused on the material when we got back to it.
Those little moments mean so much to me, because it gives me a glimpse into their lives. Almost all of the guys in our class are fathers, and it makes me so happy to hear about how they care for their children and enjoy the responsibility; family seems to be a huge motivating factor for them. I also love hearing all of their insights, because it reminds me to stay humble—I'm not above my students. They are such smart, articulate, funny, nice guys who made a mistake (or, sometimes, several mistakes) that landed them in corrections. We hope that we can bolster their motivation and help them see that they have all of these wonderful characteristics that can help them succeed in life if they keep working hard.
Another thing we've realized is how much the guys like being introspective and learning about themselves. Like I said, they're already intelligent. They know about job applications and resumes and cover letters and all that boring stuff (it's disappointing sometimes to realize just how remedial employment programming is). What they seem to really benefit from are things like a learning style (VARK) test or a discussion about their weaknesses and least favorite jobs. From this, they can learn what work environment and supervision style is best for them and how they can succeed and overcome barriers. We are going to incorporate several more "quiz" and discussion-provoking activities in the rest of the trial as well as during the study groups once they begin.
To send our guys off on a fun note, we are going to give each group member an envelope on the last day of class and have everyone write notes to each other. I was inspired by the senior send off in my high school choir. Every year, we would make bags for the seniors and decorate them and leave them notes about how they inspired us, or write down a favorite memory, or wish them luck. I thought it might be nice to do something similar for our group. It totally sucks that we can't follow up with them at all after the program or once they're released, so having something to remember us, each other, and their time in the group by could be a nice keepsake and a pick-me-up later on.
This activity will be a part of our closing. In any helping profession, when you are getting near the end of your time with a client, you want to take some time to talk to them about how you're both feeling about letting go. It's also vital to leave the client with confidence. I truly have all the confidence in the world in our guys, and we are going to take the time to tell them that and write them notes as well. I so wish that we could follow our little cubs out into the world, but unfortunately we have to let them go. And, more than all of our frustrations and set backs, that will be the hardest thing to do.
Until next time,
E & K
Wednesday, April 1, 2015
Today’s Lesson: Hair Politics
ü
Arrive 30 minutes early
ü
Give participant list to guards 20 minutes early
ü
Set up classroom by preparing white-board,
posters, and hand out activities
ü
Participants arrive at 9:15
ü
Obnoxious disrupting conversation in the hallway
outside of the classroom for entirety of class
For the first time since we started TEP we had our class
start on time! Copious amounts of
e-mails, conversations, and clarifications have been paying off. We are finally
getting the true hour and 15 minutes we should have with our participants.
While everyone was there on time, we did have a complicating factor of noise
outside the classroom. The door of the classroom is always left open (which I
understand is for our safety) but the noise it lets in constantly interrupts
the flow of the class. In addition to
the noise I am starting to feel frustrated by the bare-bones with which we are
provided to teach. As I am coming to
learn the TEP curriculum better, I keep finding materials I want to bring into
the classroom. Even something like a
simple YouTube video would be impossible because not only is there no Wi-Fi, but
we cannot bring in laptops or cellphones.
I’m starting to feel like I’ve been at MSI much longer than
2 weeks and I feel much more protective of my students than I ever expected. Today we talked about handling stress that
comes along with the job search. Our
group brought up discrimination as bring a stressor, (this is something we will
be touching more on when we go over interviews) but, specifically discrimination
due to his dreads and black hairstyles.
As a white woman with crazy curly hair I understand the feeling of needing
to straighten and “control” it, but I’ve never been worried about not getting a
job because my hair can be unruly. Comparatively, I am privileged. One young man explained to me that he is
expected to shave his dreads in order to get a job and attributed his hair as
being the reason to never making it to the final round of an interview. I was pretty shocked and wasn’t sure if this
was just an excuse. This particular young
man has beautiful dreaded hair that even in jail he keeps braided away from his
face in what appears to me as a professional and respectable way.
Upon getting back to CJC I checked up on this dread stuff. I don’t know if I just didn’t want to believe
that hair has this much power, but I underestimated my privilege in this
particular arena. A prominent story I came across was about a young African American
man, George, pursing his MBA Thurgood Marshall College (a HBC). In November of 2014, George was banned from a
conference that provides 500 of the nation’s top HBC students with leadership
training and networking opportunities with Fortune 500 companies. His admittance to the conference was contingent
upon his hair removal. My student was absolutely right. It kills me to think that it is 2015 and this
shit is still happening. Looking to
George, who is not only an exemplary student, but who was also the president of
the Graduate Student Association at the time makes me worried sick about the
young men I am teaching. Can you
overcome dreads and a criminal record? Are dreads even something to “overcome”??
As part of employment training do I need to explicitly say, “All African
American men must shave their head to obtain employment.” I will not. I can’t imagine that if I decided to dread my
hair that that my invitation to a conference would be revoked.
Until next time
E & K
Friday, March 27, 2015
Livin' On a Prayer
Whoah, we're halfway there! End of week two!
Today after session Ellie showed me this
article. It was so powerful to hear the message, especially after some of
the comments in class today. The comment regarding “poverty of the spirit” is
from the following quote by Mother Teresa:
“The greatest disease in the West today is not TB or leprosy; it is being unwanted, unloved, and uncared for. We can cure physical diseases with medicine, but the only cure for loneliness, despair, and hopelessness is love. There are many in the world who are dying for a piece of bread but there are many more dying for a little love. The poverty in the West is a different kind of poverty -- it is not only a poverty of loneliness but also of spirituality.”
In class today, we asked one participant that arrived
early for some feedback about the curriculum so far. He said that he wanted us
to talk about overcoming the despair and hopelessness that a lot of the men in
jail feel. That really stuck with us. We know the population we work with is largely
unwanted. We know that there are so many people who would rather just forget
about the men we work with and lock them away. We know how many people don’t
care about how they’re treated or if they receive the services they need. It
was a moment of clarity and sadness to hear that individuals that are
incarcerated know that too. Can you imagine how that must feel—to know that the
majority of the world doesn’t believe in you and will do anything it takes to keep
you isolated from the rest of the world?
In part because of this experience, we are adding in
an insightful activity that we participated in during our orientation to the
Brown School. The activity consists of hanging up chart paper on the walls,
writing on each one a commonly stereotyped individual, and asking participants
to write down what stereotypes they would associate with that person. Some of
the examples we will use include: “A black man driving a Mercedes benz,” “A
Hispanic male,” and “A blonde woman wearing a skirt.”
Both Ellie and I loved this exercise during
orientation, and we feel like it will be helpful in facilitating a conversation
about stereotypes these men will face when applying for jobs and how to
overcome these stereotypes or turn them into positives. Huge thanks to our
friend at school who mentioned that she was doing this exercise with a group at
her internship! It just goes to show you how networking (even with friends and
colleagues) can be beneficial!
Today we were in the chapel again (wamp wamp) BUT it
was set up with tables and chairs when we got there. AND the guard asked us for
our list as soon as he saw us approaching the chapel, so we were able to get
everyone called out and to the chapel on time. Lesson learned: copy the
superintendent on emails about requests for preparing the classroom (or
chapel), and keep the participant list on you at all times.
In addition to starting on time, this was the first
day that we got through everything within our allotted time frame. The pacing
of today’s class was great and seemed to keep the group engaged. We had a few
clever moments today, such as using post it notes to denote checkboxes on one
of our large poster prints instead of a marker so that we can reuse the poster
(side note: we need to reuse them because it cost more than $200 to print 10
posters). I also randomly decided to ask the group members to apply our lesson
about “I messages” over the next few days. Ellie and I decided after class that
we would continue asking group members to apply what we learn in class to their
daily lives at the jail and then debrief about it at the beginning of the next
session.
Another activity we asked the group about adding to
the beginning of each class is a “high/low,” where we would ask each member to
share a high and low point about their weeks. They didn’t seem too gung-ho
about the idea, and one group member said we should focus on the positive with
only a “high,” and he added that we could ask what one thing they learned last
session was. We thought that was such an insightful comment to connect to
previous classes and review, and we will be doing that for the rest of our
sessions.
Usually we will have participants break into pairs or
small groups to complete activities, or we do them together as a class. Today,
though, we decided to split into two smaller groups with Ellie and I joining
each one. This was really successful for encouraging the less talkative group
members to speak up. It seems like it was less intimidating to just have one of
the facilitators and a more intimate group.
Another activity that promoted a lot of unexpected
discussion was a chart entitled “Reasons for Being Late or Absent” that listed
possible reasons for being late to work and asked the group to decide whether
it was a good or bad reason, or okay if not to often. There was disagreement on
almost every reason, but the group members were able to come to a consensus
usually on their own. It was great to see them thinking critically and putting
their all into a group activity.
There was a little hiccup in today’s session when one
of the participants mentioned that there were “men with fancy new iPhones
walking around taking pictures” of the facility, and “they’re trying to make it
look good in here today.” One of the men took a picture of our group through
the window of the chapel, which made us all feel uncomfortable. The guys
apparently all know about the scrutiny that MSI is under and knew about the
article we linked in our previous post. Again, it was interesting to hear that
they all know about this scrutiny (how do they know??—they don’t have internet
access), and we wondered for a moment if perhaps that was why everything ran so
smoothly today in terms of room setup and call out. We will keep you posted on
this as we find out more!
Until next time,
E&K
Happy Social Worker month!!! #CupcakesAndButtons |
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
Working out the kinks
Kelly and I are getting the hang of this whole teaching in prison
thing. While Kelly had experience working
with inmates previously, my closest experience was teaching art classes to a
gaggle of unruly grade school students armed with mass amounts of glitter and
paint. Due to my lack of experience, I came to this position of facilitating a
group of 17-25 year-old incarcerated fathers with a great deal of hesitation
and trepidation. At week two, I can honestly say I am glad to have art camp
behind me. Facilitating TEP at MSI isn’t
much different than any other job I’ve had.
The only difference is getting patted down upon entering and having a
few doors that have to be unlocked along the way by guards to your office.
Our second week has gotten off to a smooth start. We arrived 30 minutes early today with posters rolled up, flip chart, and tote bag in hand filled with the necessities of pens, extra folders, class hand-outs, paper, dry erase markers, and tape. The funny thing about working in a prison is that there is a great deal of inconsistency in what I imagined as such a rigid and strict environment. Upon going in to TEP today we were told that we needed a clear bag for all of our belongings so that guards could see what was inside. Obviously we are happy to comply, but it is frustrating getting all of the information in little bits and pieces versus as a coherent message.
Kelly and I were thrilled to be able to walk to our classroom, hang our print-outs and write today’s discussion questions on the white board all before the class arrived. We were set to go at 9:15 on the dot. Kelly and I were ready for attentive bright eyed students and maybe even an apple on our desk to start the session. (Note: Kelly likes Honey crisp and I, Fuji) We were brought back down to reality when the classroom was empty until 9:35 when the first 3 individuals trickled in yellow jump suit and all. Right, we are in a prison. By 9:45 we were up to 7. I didn’t think absent faces would bother me, but both Kelly and I felt a nagging feeling when two participants did not show up when they had no excuse. Kelly and I are hoping to solve this problem by having our own list of participants so that upon our arrival we can give it to a guard and tell them to go to town. Previously, it was expected that the guards would have our participants in the classroom on their own, but it is clear that this is also our responsibility.
Week 2 continues to be a learning process. Kelly and I are continually updating our curriculum to meet the needs of the inmates and we welcome their feedback. Last week we provided them with a resource packet and we were slightly taken aback today to hear how difficult it is for them to secure resources pamphlets within the facility. This was especially poignant after reading this article: Protesters, former inmates want the St. Louis workhouse to close in the Saint Louis Post Dispatch about our current practicum placement.
To end on a positive note: While doing a lesson about problem solving we ad-libbed and did a group example on the board because we thought some clarification was needed. It was a success! While last week we noted that our personal examples help, adding a group example after our example seems to be the most effective. This is great to know so that when we meet over the weekend to practice the upcoming session we can find space to add such points in the next session.
Chapel countdown = 6 more sessions
E & K
Our second week has gotten off to a smooth start. We arrived 30 minutes early today with posters rolled up, flip chart, and tote bag in hand filled with the necessities of pens, extra folders, class hand-outs, paper, dry erase markers, and tape. The funny thing about working in a prison is that there is a great deal of inconsistency in what I imagined as such a rigid and strict environment. Upon going in to TEP today we were told that we needed a clear bag for all of our belongings so that guards could see what was inside. Obviously we are happy to comply, but it is frustrating getting all of the information in little bits and pieces versus as a coherent message.
Kelly and I were thrilled to be able to walk to our classroom, hang our print-outs and write today’s discussion questions on the white board all before the class arrived. We were set to go at 9:15 on the dot. Kelly and I were ready for attentive bright eyed students and maybe even an apple on our desk to start the session. (Note: Kelly likes Honey crisp and I, Fuji) We were brought back down to reality when the classroom was empty until 9:35 when the first 3 individuals trickled in yellow jump suit and all. Right, we are in a prison. By 9:45 we were up to 7. I didn’t think absent faces would bother me, but both Kelly and I felt a nagging feeling when two participants did not show up when they had no excuse. Kelly and I are hoping to solve this problem by having our own list of participants so that upon our arrival we can give it to a guard and tell them to go to town. Previously, it was expected that the guards would have our participants in the classroom on their own, but it is clear that this is also our responsibility.
Week 2 continues to be a learning process. Kelly and I are continually updating our curriculum to meet the needs of the inmates and we welcome their feedback. Last week we provided them with a resource packet and we were slightly taken aback today to hear how difficult it is for them to secure resources pamphlets within the facility. This was especially poignant after reading this article: Protesters, former inmates want the St. Louis workhouse to close in the Saint Louis Post Dispatch about our current practicum placement.
To end on a positive note: While doing a lesson about problem solving we ad-libbed and did a group example on the board because we thought some clarification was needed. It was a success! While last week we noted that our personal examples help, adding a group example after our example seems to be the most effective. This is great to know so that when we meet over the weekend to practice the upcoming session we can find space to add such points in the next session.
Chapel countdown = 6 more sessions
E & K
Saturday, March 21, 2015
The Beginning
The Planning Phase and Day One
Well hey there everybody! Kelly here. I have been given the task of writing the first blog post, so hopefully I'll kick it off right!
Let's start from the beginning. Ellie and I met in Fall 2014 during our first semester of graduate school (see our About Us page for all of the details on us and our studies!). We are both research assistants for Dr. Carrie Pettus-Davis, a professor at the Brown School whose work focuses on adult incarcerated populations and reentry. Last semester we helped Carrie with an in-development decarceration initiative and contacted criminal justice stakeholders for their input.
We also both interviewed and received and offer for an internship at the City Justice Center (CJC) Division of Corrections (DOC) in downtown St. Louis. When we started our internship, we had a general idea of what we would be doing. Ellie knew she would be working through a grant with the Fathers Support Center (check out our Resources and Collaborators page for links and descriptions) and I knew I would be working with certified juveniles (juveniles who are being tried as adults due to the nature of their crimes).
We soon found out that the Fathers Support Center wanted to implement job readiness programming at the Medium Security Institution (MSI), one of two jails in St. Louis city, and this project was going to be Ellie's focus. Initially, Ellie came on to this project from a research stance, but it quickly changed to a facilitator role. Ellie asked me to help out because she had never facilitated and felt uncomfortable taking on the project by herself. At first I was just helping her develop the curriculum, but once I was in it, I wanted to take on more, so now we are facilitating together and attending weekly meetings with Carrie to discuss progress and debrief.
For the past couple of months, we have been compiling materials, meeting with community stakeholders, and developing the curriculum. It's been a new experience for both of us to adapt a program and make it our own, and it's been complicated by communication issues. Because we work at CJC but the program will be at MSI, it's been incredibly frustrating to try and coordinate everything between two facilities.
These frustrations have been ongoing from the beginning—from touring MSI to forming our mock group to figuring out who is involved with the project and whom to contact—and continued to our first day. We got there half an hour early for our first session and were unable to enter the facility because of a "situation in medical," were unable to make copies of our materials after being told previously that we would have access to a copy machine, and had two people unable to participate in our session due to disability and language barrier.
Despite this rough start, we ended up having an awesome group. They were very respectful and displayed common sense and intelligence. We were especially impressed with their comments when we made "ground rules." Because neither Ellie nor I had ever experienced ground rules in a group setting before beginning graduate school, we assumed the group would have difficulty as well. But when we broached the topic, they knew exactly what ground rules were and came up with a comprehensive list on their own. We didn't even have to pull any rules from the examples we had written down in our notes because they said them all.
![]() |
Day One's Agenda |
At the beginning of the session, the group members' body language didn't necessarily indicate that they wanted to learn, and several of them commented that they didn't want to be there, but their actions after class started showed that they were motivated. They followed their ground rules to a T. They didn't talk over each other, and they listened to their classmates. We got lots of great feedback about our facilitation style and our personalities, and we felt like they were comfortable with us because we are peers and still in school. I think the fact that we explained that we are volunteers and students gave them a level of respect for us.
We didn't have time to get through everything we had planned and ended up sending them home with more things than we wanted to, but now we have an idea of how to better manage our time. We also quickly discovered that although we thought we had planned ahead enough, we now know that we will have to have everything ready beforehand when working in this type of facility. It's unpredictable, and you never know when there will be a "situation" or a lockdown, or when, you know, access to a simple copy machine will be barred.
Bilingual Behind Bars
I made a separate heading for this story, even though it happened on day one, because it was just so cool. So as I mentioned before, there was a group member who struggled to participate because of a language barrier. When we asked him to share, he said, "I speak very little English." Ellie, without skipping a beat, began speaking to him and translating all of the instructions in Spanish. The looks on the group members' faces were absolutely priceless, and it's all they wanted to talk about after session ended. Ellie got major street cred for busting out her bilingual skills.
Of course, we were not prepared to have to translate and we don't know if he'll be able to participate because we only have an hour for class, but it was just such a great moment to see Ellie step up and take an unexpected complication in stride.
Day Two
![]() |
Day Two's Agenda |
I made copies Thursday morning so that Ellie and I were fully prepared to just walk in and start class on Friday. Except that none of the participants were there, which was a bit of an issue. Apparently the call out process is more complicated than we thought, and we started class late again because we had to wait for the guards to call each participant out of his bunk.
Because of scheduling conflicts at MSI, our Friday classes for the TEP mock group are held in the chapel as opposed to the classroom. It's a huge space, but it's also hotter than Australia in December and echoey and noisy so that we couldn't understand anyone when they were speaking. This also made it more distracting to the participants and made it difficult for them to hear their peers share. Ellie and I had to share a tiny podium and hang charts on a wall that was 15 feet behind us. Overall, the space was not conducive to learning at all, and we are going to do our best to schedule programming only in the classroom for future groups.
Participation was high again today though, despite location complications. The group members were raising their hands and shouting out answers as soon as we asked them to share. Because of this, we're going to focus more on interactive activities rather than lectures. We didn't have a lot of lecture to begin with, but it's clear that the group members prefer working in pairs or small groups, completing worksheets, and sharing with each other and with us.
Ellie and I are also trying to have fun with the class and participate ourselves. We complete most of the activities and worksheets as well, and share our own answers as part of the process. For example, we asked the group to complete a networking worksheet today about their "inner circles," or people they know that could help them get jobs in the future. Ellie and I completed this worksheet as well, noting Carrie, Kimberly (our intern supervisor), and even a caseworker at MSI as people in our "circle." They also asked us about our experiences in conducting informational interviews as part of networking, and we were able to tell them first-hand how helpful they are. It seems like the group enjoys having real-world examples from people close to their age who are also experiencing uncertainty about jobs and our future.
Perhaps Ellie and I's greatest strength in all of this is our age. Think about it: when a parent or other adult tells you about how they got their first job, it's easy to tune out and think that their experiences must be different because times have changed. But when you're talking to someone who is in your cohort, you can share experiences from things that happened within the past few weeks or months, not 25 years ago. Of course, that doesn't mean that those things that happened 25 years ago aren't still relevant today, but it's all about perception, especially when working with a vulnerable population like inmates.
The way that Ellie and I treat the group members may also contribute to their willingness to participate. The manner in which we speak to them is vastly different than that of the guards. We treat them with the same respect we expect them to give us and their fellow group members, we don't talk down to them, and we make it clear that we will answer any questions or concerns they might have without chastising them. Of course, the guards have a very different job than we do, but it really makes me think about how your demeanor can make all the difference in encouraging people to speak out and behave well.
Just some food for thought to end this week. Until next time.
E & K
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)